Peak Oil

  • Posted by Sean
  • Filed in City
  • November 19, 2006

111906_OilCrash.jpgThe great Vancouver Water Catastrophe of 2006 got me thinking about the future, specifically what we're going to do, not when an earthquake happens although that is of some concern, but of a much greater and more equivocal dilemma; when we run out of cheap oil. The issue finally reached the clutches of corporate media when the Sun ran an article in September. Of course Vancouver's finest independent media have been drilling for answers, especially The Republic, which has a blurb in this week's edition. The Straight also mentions the coming crisis with a focus on YVR.

Vancouverites might also have been made aware of the coming quandary at this year's Film Festival as Crude Awakening was screened. If you still want to learn more about this subject, there will be a presentation by David Hughes. Sunday, November 26, 7:00 PM Centennial Theatre 2300 Lonsdale Avenue North Vancouver.

So what is Peak Oil? Well its the fact that dwindling oil supplies means we can't keep consuming the same amount of energy. It also means that the price of oil, and anything transported by oil including food, will skyrocket. Alternative energy sources must be considered immediately, but some say its too late. Ethanol and hydrogen have been proposed but they are both net-energy losers. Of course the political ramifications are already apparent: wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the rise of China as a economic superpower, the decline of the petrodollar, the rise of Venezuela as a socialist power, the geo-strategic importance of Israel to American interests, etc. Basically, we're doomed.

Reader Reviews and Comments

Submit a Review or Comment

One problem I see with this issue is that it isn’t properly explained.
This is obvious because a lot of people think the hydrogen fuel cell is the answer.
It is NOT.

Human kind needs a new energy Source.
Technologies like the H fuel cell is not a source it is a medium and it is useful.
Once we develop a new source, or use the ones we have like wind and solar, the fuel cell will give us a good way to store this energy in a mobile form (we use batteries now, and they suck).

Ethanol, to my knowledge, uses more power to refine it than it gives off. I personally think this is some stupid idea oil companies are feeding us as a solution, so we don’t create the change we need. IE phasing out cars.

Posted by: jeff h at November 20, 2006 12:27 PM | Quote Comment

I used to wonder, "When will people open their eyes? When will resource use patterns change, and when will we do something about the damage we're doing to our environment and ourselves, and about our unsustainable way of life?"

Now, with more natural and humanitarian disasters being related to climate change, people are starting to talk about it. I think it just has to get worse before it gets better. People won't proactively change, it has to be that it isn't worth their while to go on as they are, at the time they make the decision.

Now I only wonder if it will be too late or not.

Posted by: Derelicte at November 20, 2006 2:47 PM | Quote Comment

@jeff, we need to decrease our consumption. alterntaive sources won't come close to meeting the demand.

Posted by: sean orr at November 20, 2006 3:28 PM | Quote Comment

We need to decrease our consumption is a sound idea. But how can we potentially do this, when all those in higher positions of power think the opposite? to what degree you think our personal choices have an any effects, when majority of people don't even think about changing ways. have you been to the mall lately?

How long are we going to go around our fucked up political system and blame our own habits only? the changes need to be made BOTH on a personal level AND from above. We need to put people in charge who think like us, people who won't go behind our back and resell everything to the banks and the corporations.

the rest of it is a religious fight from the point of view of guilt with an external world that constantly encourages you to consume more. People are not interested in this. if some changes are made from above, then those personal sacrifices won't become so personal; it would be everyone's through government intervention.

Posted by: NEVER AGAIN at November 21, 2006 1:29 AM | Quote Comment

Agreed.

Posted by: sean orr at November 21, 2006 1:57 AM | Quote Comment

Rather than let the media continue to provide a one-sided view on this situation, I suggest you read: The Bottomless Well: The Twilight of Fuel, the Virtue of Waste, and Why We Will Never Run Out of Energy. I don't know if I agree with the concept but it is an interesting perspective.

Posted by: ryan at November 21, 2006 3:08 AM | Quote Comment

Hi,
the issue at hand is not easy, there is eternal "war" between the peak-oil people and the ones that try to downplay the problem. As most things, everything has two sides. As an example, please read this article in the New Yorker:
http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/061127ta_talk_surowiecki

Talking about vicious circle. I wonder how the issue of Ethanol imports and oil subsidies is being treated in Canada?

Posted by: Fabian at November 21, 2006 1:55 PM | Quote Comment

There's always Cuba as an exampe and model for positive action in a time of energy crisis. It definately wasn't easy for them, and it's not likely to be easy for any other place to make lasting changes, but it could happen.

Posted by: sw at November 25, 2006 1:19 AM | Quote Comment

Post a comment

Remember Me?
Disclaimer: Comments and blog entries represent the viewpoints of the individual and no one else.